Indian government has made its stance on CAA very clear to the Supreme Court.

▪︎ Rohingya Muslims have no fundamental right to live and settle in India.

▪︎ India does not recognize UNHCR card which some of the Rohingya illegals have secured to claim refugee status in India.

▪︎ Judiciary has no right to enter in the legislative and policy domains of the Parliament.

▪︎ Judiciary cannot create a separate grant of refugee status to those illegally entering into India.

▪︎ Whether or not to grant refugee status to a certain class of persons is purely a policy decision; and not a judicial one.

▪︎ Right to equality is not available to foreigners and illegal immigrants (in context of granting refugee status & citizenship).

anna's complete interview with @TimesNow Anchor Navika Kumar speaks to Annamalai on several issues including BJP's Tamil Nadu mission, Sanatan row, CAA and more. The BJP leader asserts BJP's unique value system as a cadre-driven party, emphasizing equality across all ranks from the Prime Minister to a booth-level worker.
#kannamalai #bjp #boothlevelworker #equality #pmmodi #publicmanchwithannamalai #navikakumar #englishnews #latestnews
https://youtu.be/0SUtn1aYyek?si=85hN1LPgJVnvYXkD

Maja Daruwala

Maja Daruwala, a barrister from Lincolns Inn, has been advocating for rights and social justice for over 40 years. Her special interests lie in civil liberties, gender equality, systems reform, rule of law, accountability, promoting access to information, and access to justice.

Remember Gurmehar Kaur?

What is common between Gurmehar Kaur and Maja Daruwala?

fauji Daughters and Human rights

What is Human Rights? CIA weapon to pressure developing economies?

have you ever heard Human Right voice in China, Pakistan Saudi etc? Why Not?
DGP

First, they came for free housing, free health care, freedom from oppression, the right to speak freely, and most of all for free money, we welcomed them and helped them because freedom, democracy, multiculturalism, and charity are good.

Then they came for our books and discarded them and, we helped them by doing nothing because they told us their books were good, our books bad.

Then they came for the girl children and we helped them by ignoring it as long as we could because it was a cultural thing and we didn’t want to appear to be anti their culture, and it was only the worthless children of the white underclass who were being taken, not ours.

Then they came for the racists, and we helped them by designating Islam a race because white racism is bad and no other form exists.

Then they came for the Islamophobes, and we helped them by calling Islam a religion of peace because hatred of non-Judeo-Christian religions is bad and, anyway, a phobia is an irrational fear, and as we are sublimely rational and fully understand such things. Islamophobia is obviously evil and dangerous and must be eradicated.

Then they came for the protestors, and we let them and helped them because freedom of speech, Euro-Culturalism, gender equality, racism, and Islamophobia are all bad things from our past and must be done away with so that there will be peace and harmony and nice times for all in one big, happy family.

But we were wrong

Now they have come for us because Islam is in reality a nihilistic, primitive, misogynous, totalitarian political system that tolerates neither deviation nor dissent, and we are just not nihilistic, primitive, misogynous, and totalitarian enough for their requirements.

First They Came… “First they came for free housing, free health care, freedom from oppression, the right to speak freely, and most of all for the free money, and Europe welcomed them and helped them because freedom, democracy, multiculturalism, and charity are good.

“Then they came for their books and discarded them and, they helped them by doing nothing because they told their books good, your books bad.

“Then they came for the girl children and Europe helped them by ignoring it as long as they could because it was a cultural thing and Europe didn’t want to appear to be anti their culture, and it was only the worthless children of the white underclass who were being taken, not elites.

“Then they came for the racists, and Europe helped them by designating Islam a race because white racism is bad and no other form exists.

“Then they came for the Islamophobes, and Europe helped them by calling Islam a religion of peace because hatred of non-Judeo Christian religions is bad and, anyway, a phobia is an irrational fear, and as Europeans are sublimely rational and fully understand such things. Islamophobia is obviously evil and dangerous and must be eradicated.

“Then they came for the protestors, and Europe let them and helped them because freedom of speech, Euro-Culturalism, gender equality, racism, and Islamophobia are all bad things from the European past and must be done away with so that there will be peace and harmony and nice times for all in one big, happy family.

“But Europeans were wrong, how wrong they were! Now Muslims have come for all Europeans because Islam is, in reality, a nihilistic, primitive, misogynous, totalitarian political system that tolerates neither deviation nor dissent, and the Europeans are just not nihilistic, primitive, misogynous, and totalitarian enough for their requirements.

A 19-foot statue of BR Ambedkar, named 'Statue of Equality' and also the largest outside India, is set to be unveiled in the US state of Maryland on October 14

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, PIN Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]

The Secretary
Law Commission of India
The Indian Law Institute Building
Bhagwan Dass Road
New Delhi - 110001

Subject: Support for Uniform Civil Code Implementation and Safeguarding Women's Rights

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to express my wholehearted support for the implementation of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India, and specifically to address how such a code can safeguard women's rights. As a concerned citizen, I firmly believe that a UCC is essential for promoting equality, justice, and gender empowerment in our diverse and multicultural society.

1. Gender Equality and Non-discrimination: A UCC would play a crucial role in ensuring gender equality and non-discrimination by eliminating the discriminatory provisions present in various personal laws. By providing a common legal framework, a UCC would uphold the principles of equal rights and equal protection before the law for women, regardless of their religious or cultural background.

2. Protection from Discriminatory Practices: Many personal laws have provisions that are discriminatory towards women, such as unequal rights in matters of marriage, divorce, inheritance, and property rights. A UCC would address these disparities and establish uniform standards, guaranteeing women equal rights and protection under the law. It would eliminate regressive practices that perpetuate gender-based discrimination and contribute to the empowerment of women.

3. Strengthening Women's Agency: A UCC would empower women by granting them the right to make choices and decisions that are essential to their well-being and personal growth. It would protect their freedom of conscience, the right to marry by choice, the right to divorce, and the right to inherit property, enabling women to exercise their agency and assert their rights on an equal footing with men.

4. Safeguarding Women's Rights during Marriage and Divorce: A UCC can provide a comprehensive framework for marriage and divorce, ensuring that women's rights are protected throughout these processes. It can establish fair and just provisions for issues like marriage registration, dissolution of marriage, division of property, custody of children, and maintenance, all of which would contribute to the well-being and security of women.

5. Promoting Women's Access to Justice: Personal laws often create barriers that hinder women's access to justice. Multiple legal systems and conflicting provisions can make it difficult for women to navigate the legal process, leading to delays and denial of justice. A UCC would simplify the legal framework, making it more accessible and understandable for women, and promoting their access to justice and legal remedies.

6. Education and Awareness: Alongside the implementation of a UCC, there is a need for robust educational initiatives and awareness campaigns to inform women about their rights, legal provisions, and avenues for seeking redressal. Promoting legal literacy among women will empower them to exercise their rights and navigate the legal system effectively.

In conclusion, the implementation of a Uniform Civil Code is crucial for safeguarding women's rights in India. A UCC will promote gender equality, eliminate discriminatory practices, and empower women by ensuring equal access to justice and legal protection. I urge the Law Commission of India to consider these factors and take proactive steps towards formulating and implementing a UCC that upholds the principles of justice, equality, and women's empowerment.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that the Law Commission of India will prioritize the implementation of a Uniform Civil Code and work towards creating a more equitable and just society for all citizens.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Name]

Send to:

membersecretary-lci@gov.in

Democracy is one of our sacred and shared values. Throughout history, one thing has been clear, democracy is the spirit that supports equality and dignity. Democracy is the idea that welcomes debate and discourse. Democracy is the culture that gives wings to thought and expression. India is blessed to have such values from time immemorial. India is the mother of democracy: Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the joint sitting of the US Congress